|
|
|
Watershed Voices
-
Mandwa Watershed Project
|

download |
|
Mandwa Village : The Metamorphosis of
Life After Water Seeped Into its Soil ...
|
|
With the agrarian crisis spreading its deadly
grip over regions earlier considered well endowed, is a self-reliant
village economy a tangible dream? Is it anywhere close to an
attainable goal in an era where lop-sided development is the norm?
While attempts are afoot to find responses on different fronts, a
solution that is basic, sure and sustainable is to conserve and enrich
the natural resource base on which the village community depends for
its sustenance and livelihood. Going along with nature by protecting
and developing watersheds is one of the tried and tested methods of
being ensured of receiving from mother earth ceaselessly from one
generation to the next. And when this is managed by a zealous and
persistent community, it provides a continuous spin to a virtuous and
veritable cycle of sustainable living. Such a model addresses the twin
objectives of conservation and rural development. With several
empirical evidences of its successes to its credit, participatory
watershed development is emerging as a radical model for sustainable
development that scores many points over other suggested methods.
Mandwa located in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra effectively
showcases how developing the resource base through participatory
watershed development can result in overall sustainable development.
It is a small village of 80 households in the Hingna Taluka of Nagpur
District, with a heterogeneous and predominantly tribal population.
All villages of this area generally being small are organized into the
Gat Gram Panchayats (Group Village Panchayats), which implies clubbing
together of 3 or 4 villages. Mandwa is a member of such a Gat Gram
Panchayat that consists of three other villages.
|
|
The Onset of Transition |
|
Mandwa today is a clean & beautiful village with productive fields where happy
and cheerful faces have replaced the sullen ones of yore. Not long ago, the
scenario was completely different. Season upon season of failed rains had
rendered the land unproductive and the villagers unemployed. Even during the
good rainfall years, owing to the lack of irrigation facilities, agriculture
was generally merely subsistent in nature. The half-year’s employment that was
available in the village was far from sufficient to take care of the basic
needs of the villagers and the condition was even more severe during the low
rainfall years. This obviously churned out acute poverty and low standards of
living for the inhabitants, thereby making seasonal migration inevitable.
At such a point of time, CRTDP (Comprehensive Rural and Tribal
Development Project), an NGO working to provide health and
education support to the villagers, felt the need for some
sustainable action that would ensure a decent livelihood for the
villagers. While CRTDP trains villagers in vocational skills like
sewing, embroidery and other such activities, it realized that
holistic development of a village would neither be complete nor
sustainable in the absence of an assured income from agriculture,
the primary economic activity of the village. With this objective
in mind, Mr. Karim David, Director, CRTDP approached WOTR way back
in 1993 to explore the possibilities of developing the watershed
around the village. This started off a series of joint efforts
wherein Mr. Karim David from CRTDP and Crispino Lobo of WOTR made
several visits to the village to convince the villagers about the
benefits of developing their watershed.
|
|
The Herculean Task Called
"Rapport Building" |
|
It certainly wasn’t easy. The first few meetings went futile as the
villagers were skeptical and doubted the intentions of the
organizations. It is quite a daunting task to win the trust of a rural
tribal community, where social norms and cultural values play a major
role in all their mundane activities. Religion was also a deterrent as
they were a Hindu community and they feared that forceful conversion
would be the result if the missionaries were to start any kind of work
in their village. The villagers also feared that their lands would be
taken away from them. Besides at that time, little was known about the
concept of watershed development. When it was introduced at their Gram
Sabha meetings, they either failed to understand or refused to believe
that such a concept existed or that it can bring about any kind of a
change in their impoverished lives.
Perseverance
however paid off. Slowly CRTDP and WOTR managed to work their way
through the hearts of the people and convinced them to visit other
villages where watershed work had actually been undertaken. Thus, a
group of 50 villagers went on an exposure visit to Ahmednagar district,
where they engaged themselves in meaningful and eye-opening dialogues
with farmers and witnessed the transition that had taken place. These
villages were Mendhwan, Pimpalgaon Wagha & Kasare. Such dramatic changes
through the watershed interventions had not been anticipated by them!
Besides, the fears of their lands being taken away from them and such
other fears were laid to rest. This was indeed ‘the’ turning point and
the people zealously resolved to prove the credibility of watershed in
their own village. This was a blaze of glory for WOTR. The villagers
still cherish the memories of their 16 hours journey; their first step
out of their district to the village of Mendwan that morphed their lives
forever in a way they never could even fathom!
|
|
One Step at a Time |
|
The proverbial positivity of taking things one step at a time was proved yet
again.
1.
Shramdaan: Measured
‘shramdaan’ (local contribution) is a non-negotiable in a watershed
development (WSD) project. It took the villagers time to get accustomed to
the idea of ‘shramdaan’, which was both new and incomprehensible to
them. Slowly, as they began to grasp the concept got clearer the two ways of ‘shramdaan’ were introduced. The first was that of providing on-site
labor of one person-day a week at the watershed site. The bigger farmers
however preferred the second method of contribution, whereby they sent one
paid daily wage farm worker to the watershed site or paid one day’s wages to
compensate for his own absence.
2.
Imposition of Crucial Self-restrictions: Kurhadbandi (ban on cutting of trees but loppings permitted) and Charaibandi
(ban on open grazing on treated area) are the two essentials for making
watershed development succeed, at least, largely during the implementation
phase. The villagers, who were accustomed to cutting trees for fuel-wood found
it difficult to abide by the Kurhadbandi rule. Charaibandi was
also an alien concept. The ‘cut and carry’ method was incomprehensible & seemed
an unnecessary waste of time. Cattle must be left free to graze in their
opinion. After much effort and time on the part of the implementing agencies,
compliance to the rule was brought about, even though the villagers were still
not fully convinced of their positive effects.
3. Phases of Implementation: The Capacity Building Phase (CBP)
started in February 1995 and ended in 1997. A total of Rs. 3,50,000
was utilized in this phase. The focus, as the name suggests, was on mobilizing
the community and giving them ‘hands-on’ experience of running a ‘micro within
micro’ watershed. Gram Sabhas were conducted to disseminate information and to
elicit the willingness of the villagers to implement the programme. The visual
impact of video shows was to help them to better understand the project, to
allay their fears and respond to queries. They finally demonstrated their
willingness to adopt the programme by contributing four days of ‘shramdaan’,
after which a ‘Letter of Agreement’ was signed. Exposure visits and
various trainings were arranged for the members of VWC (Village Watershed
Committee), SMS (Sanyutkt Mahila Samiti), as well as SHGs (Self Help Group).
Land based treatment like CCT (continuous contour trenches), farm bunds, WAT
(water absorption trenches), contour bunds, stone outlets and Drainage Line
Treatments were undertaken during the CBP. WOTR had begun using its innovative
Participatory Net Planning tool, where households (both husbands and wives) are
required to participate in planning their land treatments and their opinions and
suggestions were duly considered.
15,713 saplings that were planted
stands testimony to the shramdaan contributed by the villagers. Rs.
7,00,000 were given for the disposition fund (Fund used for maintaining the link
between the Capacity Building Phase (CBP) and the Full Implementation Phase (FIP),
so that the work is not interrupted due to a gap between the two in terms of
lack of funds. The FIP was started in January 1998. This phase took exactly
three years and the project came to an end in January 2001.
|
|
How "Weaving a Structured
Compliance" Paid Off |
|
The Mandwa Panlot Kshetra Vikas Samiti or The Village Watershed Committee (VWC)
was formally registered on the November 1, 1999. It consists of 9 executive
members, out of whom 5 are men and 4 women. Mr. Gajanan Fagoji Choudhari is
presently the Chairman of the Mandwa VWC.
All activities of the VWC are conducted from the office of the VWC, which has
been provided for the purpose by the implementing agency. Meetings are held once
a month subject to the date specified by the Gram Panchayat.
It is remarkable that even after six years of the completion of the project,
the VWC is active and takes up watershed management activities on its own
initiative. Maintenance of the watershed treatment structures is done regularly
and without fail. These activities are carried out using the maintenance fund
provided for the purpose. At present the balance with the VWC is Rs. 1,58,000
which are the savings of the VWC from the maintenance fund.
The VWC has appointed Mr. Vinayak Hatelwar as the voluntary Panlot Sevak
(watershed helper), to look after all post-watershed activities, for a monthly
remuneration of a thousand Rupees. He is responsible for the collaboration
and communication within the village, circulating the watershed notice, and
maintaining & supervising the domestic water supply scheme of the Sanyukta
Mahila Samiti (SMS) in the village.
|
|
Moving On… |
|
The watershed
project of Mandwa can be cited as a landmark success in the Vidarbha region.
Several unparalleled positive changes mark the social as well as economic
parameters of the lives of the villagers. It is indeed stupefying to see the
variety of ways in which watershed has affected them. The first startling
observation made by the villagers themselves is that now the village has 70
Television sets and 20 motorbikes! They share this fact with mirth as well as a
sense of pride. No doubt these are items of very mundane consumption in urban
and semi-urban households. But for Mandwa, which has walked a long way from
hunger and poverty to owning television sets, surely there has had to be a
strong moving force behind it. This however is only one indicator of how
watershed has brought prosperity to the village. At the base of this
prosperity is the substantial improvement in groundwater level, which has made
agriculture a profitable 12 months long occupation. The wells that yielded water
at 20 feet depth earlier do so now at 6-7 feet. There is no dearth of work in
the village at any point of time during the whole year as agriculture has
achieved a major turnaround.
There have
been several hues of colours that have been added in their otherwise nondescript
lives.
|
|
Changes in
Land Use and Cropping Patterns |
|
Watershed has
brought about the most extraordinary change in the land use pattern in the
village. Prior to watershed intervention in the year 1997, the land under
perennial cultivation was just 15 hectares. It has jumped to 200 hectares in
2007. Vegetables were grown only over 4 hectares of land earlier but it is now
spread over 60 hectares. The value of crop yields shot up from Rs. 20,000 per
acre in 1997 to Rs. 1.25 lakhs today.
The main
Kharif crops grown in the watershed include kapus (cotton), tur (pigeon pea),
jowar (pearl millet), soyabean and red grams. While earlier only Kharif crops
were cultivated, now the villagers grow a Rabi crop too, where besides those
mentioned above, vegetables as well as wheat are also grown. Summer season is
characterized by horticultural crops. These are the hallmarks of the
watershed programme underlined by the earnest efforts of the community and the
implementing agencies.
The
increased land fertility is reflected in the land prices, which have soared from Rs. 10,000 per acre to Rs. 6,00,000 per acre for irrigated land. Surely, the
effects of a booming land trade market has petered into distant Mandwa as well!
Prices of rainfed land have also witnessed a similar rise where prices have gone
up from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 4,00,000 per acre. (Table 1,2)
|
|
Table 1 : The Impacts of Watershed at a Glance |
|
Sr. No. |
Indicators |
Pre-Watershed Prior to 1997 |
Post Watershed year 2000 |
In the Year 2007 |
| 1. |
Households (No.) |
62 |
65 |
80 |
| 2. |
Population (No.) |
320 |
243 |
425 |
3.
|
Cultivated Area (ha.)
a. Perennial
b. Seasonal
c. Vegetable Cultivation |
315
15
300
04 |
315
40
260
40 |
315
200
100
60 |
| 4. |
Wells in the village (No.) |
3 |
20 |
33 |
| 5. |
Depth of the well (feet from ground
level) |
20 |
8 -10 |
6 -7 |
| 6. |
Agriculture Employment (Months / annum) |
4 |
9 |
12 |
| 7. |
Production – crop yield (Rs/acre) |
20,000 |
75,000 |
125,000 |
| 8. |
Fodder production (for local livestock /
annum) |
8
|
12 |
Surplus |
| 9. |
Land Value (Rs. /Acre)
a)
Agriculture
b)
Waste land (Rainfed) |
10,000
2,000 |
40,000
10,000
|
6,00,000
4,00,000 |
|
10.
|
Livestock (No.)
i.
Bullock
ii.
Cow (scrub)
iii.
Cow (Crossbred)
iv.
Sheep and Goats
v.
Buffaloes |
110
163
00
400
11 |
170
120
40
200
19 |
170
120
60
100
5
|
|
11. |
Dairy Milk (Liters/day) |
20. lit./day (Only for
domestic use) |
250 to 270 |
200 (approx.)
|
|
12. |
Kitchen garden (No.) |
All the families |
All the families |
All the families |
|
13. |
Bio-gas (No.) |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
14. |
Cylinder gas (No.) |
Nil |
8 |
8 |
|
15. |
Smokeless chullas (No.) |
5 |
15 |
15 |
|
16. |
Individual latrines (No.) |
1 |
3 |
80 |
|
17. |
Soak pits (No.) |
Nil |
0 |
80 |
|
18. |
Electric Motor (No.)
Oil Engine |
2
2 |
20
Nil |
33
Nil |
|
19. |
Tractors (No.) |
1 |
Nil |
Nil |
|
20. |
Television (No.) |
1 |
15 |
70 |
|
21. |
Cycle (No.) |
60 |
40 |
25 |
|
22. |
Motorcycle (No.) |
Nil |
2 |
20 |
|
23. |
Small shops (No.) |
Nil |
1 |
2 |
|
24. |
SHGS (No.) |
Nil |
2 |
9 |
|
25. |
Members in SHGs (No.) |
Nil |
39 |
102 |
|
26. |
No of CBOs (Community Based Organisation)
(No.) |
4 |
8 |
13 |
|
27. |
Daily wages (Rs / day)
Men
Women |

Rs. 30
Rs. 15 |
Rs. 50 - 80
Rs. 30 - 60
|
Rs. 80 - 100
Rs.
40 - 55
|
|
28. |
Savings (if done) |
Nil |
Monthly savings |
Monthly savings |
|
29. |
Literacy rate (of population) |
33% |
86% |
86% |
|
|
Table 2 : Changes in the Cropping
Pattern and Production |
|
|
|
Indicators |
Pre-Watershed Prior to 1997 |
Post Watershed year 2000 |
In the Year 2007 |
|
A. |
Kharif Crops |
|
|
|
| 1. |
Cotton -
- Area covered
- Production per ha. |
186.24 ha
7 quintals
|
218 ha
9 quintals |
204.24 ha
11.25 quintals |
| 2. |
Sorghum
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
78.23 ha
17.45 quintals
|
61 ha
21.50 quintals |
40 ha
24 quintals |
| 3. |
Soyabean
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
34.43 ha
15 quintals
|
78.15 ha
21 quintals |
83.35 ha
25 quintals |
| 4. |
Vegetable
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
16.48 ha
50 quintals
|
26.25 ha
60 quintals |
44.55 ha
70 quintals |
| 5. |
Wheat
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
Nil
Nil
|
48 ha
13 quintals |
50.01 ha
15 quintals |
| 6. |
Red Gram
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
8.50 ha
6.50 quintals
|
17 ha
9.60 quintals |
20 ha
11 quintals |
| 7. |
Orange
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
16.75 ha
150 quintals
|
13.26 ha
175 quintals |
6.70 ha
175 quintals |
| 8. |
Vegetable grown in summer
- Area Covered
- Production per ha. |
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil |
33.34 ha
60 quintals |
|
|
|
|
Occupational Structure |
|
Earlier, the occupational structure was such that the villagers were engaged in
agriculture and agricultural labour for the Kharif season, which lasted for
about 5 months. Summer season again provided employment in the form of
collection of Tendu leaves (used for rolling Bidis) from the nearby forest.
These leaves would be tied into bundles of a hundred each and then sold to the
contactor. This activity would last for about 2 months and provide the villagers
with some income which was about Rs. 40-50 per person per day. The
watershed work has brought about an unprecedented change in the occupational
structure of the village. There is a resounding increase in agricultural
employment and there is now very little dependence on Tendu leaf collection.
Earlier, the entire village was engaged in this occupation. Now this has reduced
to barely 30-40 people. To work as farm labour has also become more remunerative
as the wage rate for men has gone up from Rs. 30 to Rs. 100 per day; while that
for women has gone up from Rs. 15 to Rs. 55 per day in a span of 10 years. Mr.
Bhakraji Sahare, a landless labourer, expresses his revelry in the resplendence
of the village. From the wages that he and his wife earn, they are able to send
their four children to school and dream of a prosperous future.
|
|
Livestock and Livestock Produce |
|
While livestock wasn’t essentially the primary source of income for the
villagers, they did rear a large number of cattle and goats. The main purpose of
rearing cattle was to produce farm animals. However, some milk was yielded from
these cows, which was used for self consumption. While the number of cattle has
diminished since watershed work started, milk production has seen a ten fold
increase from 20 liters per day to 200 liters per day. (Table 1) There are two
attributes behind this increase, namely, ample availability of water and fodder.
While fodder was available only for 8 months earlier, now there is a surplus
available within the village. |
|
The Master Stroke : Community
Organisation |
|
Watershed development has not only brought about economic affluence, but has
also enriched the village in many ways, where social mobilization has been
observed to be the masterstroke. Such instances of social harmony are presented
below. 1. Women’s
Self Help Groups: Since the inception of the watershed program in the
village, 8 Self Help Groups (SHGs) have been formed. There were none earlier.
The first SHG was formed on March 1, 1996, closely at the heels of the
initiation of the watershed project. It consisted of 23 members who agreed to
save Rs. 20 per month with the SHG. The second one was formed in 1998,
consisting of 16 members. As many as six SHGs were formed in the year 2006. A
total of 102 women of the village are currently members of one SHG or the other.
The total money pool of all the SHGs together today stands at Rs. 2,26,305.
Apart from the 8 SGHs, 7 women of the village were also enthused to come
together to form the Sanyukta Mahila Samiti (SMS) in 1999.
While SHGs were merely savings groups to begin with, these have now become
empowered bodies that have a prominent say in the decision-making of the
village. Another noteworthy feature is that the SMS, which works as an informal
federation of all the SHGs, spent Rs. 1,40,000 on construction of a water tank
in the village as a part of the village drinking water scheme. The SMS not only
initiated and implemented the scheme but also manages it. A monthly water fees (Pani
Patti) of Rs. 25 has been fixed for households with a private tap connection;
and those using water from public taps need to pay Rs. 13 per month.
2. Samuhik Vivah (Community Marriages): The VWC initiated this
activity with a dual purpose. One was to reduce the burden on parents of
marriage expenses of their wards and the other was to bring the community
closer. The VWC arranges this activity in coordination with the Gram Panchayat.
The marriage ceremonies are conducted with all the punctiliousness of tradition
with support from some local sponsors. Clothes and ornaments for the bride and
the bridegroom, pandals, feasts for the guests and utensils for cooking are all
provided for. The first community wedding was held in 2004, where 3 couples tied
the knot. The number has been increasing ever since and in 2006, 17 weddings
were held at the same time.
Mr. Sadashiv Harnaji Dadamal, a successful farmer of the village expresses
his feelings about the new found community bonding in the village very lucidly:
“The most important outcome of the watershed project is that people got united.
The whole village has come together to build roads which is something that was
undreamt of before.”
3. Cleanliness Drive: The “Sant Gadgebaba Gram Swachhata
Abhiyan” (Village Cleanliness Campaign) has infused a tremendous sense of
community spirit among the village Panchayats and village organizations in rural
Maharashtra. The Abhiyan offers no funds for upfront activities, but offers
prize money to villages that fare well under certain criteria laid down by the
government. This new development strategy evolved through the dictum “people
initiate, government supports”. This has brought about overall lifestyle changes
in the village.
There used to be 100 percent open defecation in the village in the
pre-watershed days. With the help of the then BDO (Block Development Officer),
Mr. Raju Gotmare, the village took on the challenge of converting itself into a
completely open defecation free village. While the Block Development Office
provided the village with material worth Rs. 1,50,000 for toilet construction,
the Panchayat Samiti provided the toilet pots, pipes and technical support.
The village today has 80 private toilets and is hundred percent free of open
defecation. Mandwa has recently been honoured with the “Nirmal Gram Puraskar”,
which comprises of Rs. 5,00,000, which is an award for cleanliness under the
above stated ‘abhiyan’. It was given away by the honorable President of India on
May 4, 2007. Gajanan Choudhary (the Vice Sarpanch) and the VWC President had
gone to Delhi to recieve this award. PLS (Panlot Sevak Samiti) member Mr.
Vinayak has assured that the entire prize money would be utilized for village
development.
4. Ban on Alcohol: Alcoholism was one of the major social
problems of the village as domestic violence was rampant under the influence of
liquor. The women of Mandwa took up the cudgels against this very strongly. One
of the women, Chhayabai Choudhari, narrated the incident when the women had
caught a villager red-handed with a pot of liquor hidden in his house. The
liquor was seized with the help of the police and thrown out of the house. There
is hundred percent compliance of Darubandi (ban on alcohol) in the village now.
|
|
Diligence Honoured |
The undeterred efforts of the villagers have not gone unnoticed. The various
awards that the village has received include:
- Panlot Puraskar worth Rs. 15,000 and a memento at the state level.
- Cash prize worth Rs. 5,000 in the best watershed project competition.
- The feather in their cap, however, is the “Nirmal Gram Puraskar” the
village has received from the President of India under the “Sant Gadgebaba
Gram Swachhata Abhiyan” as mentioned above.
Another form of recognition gets reflected in the increasing number of
visitors to the village every year. The pattern is interesting to look at.
- 54 institutions visited during the watershed work
- 60 institutions visited after the completion of the work
These comprised of local level institutions, and government as well as
non-governmental institutions.
|
|
Peoples' Perspectives |
|
People of the village are able to articulate precisely the sweeping changes they
have experienced in their lives owing to the watershed work. For instance,
Bhakraji Sahare and his wife had to routinely migrate out of the village in
search of work earlier, as in the village they could find only six months of
employment. This had not only disturbed the stability of the family, but also
disturbed the education of their children. But today the family leads a stable
life with ample work available in the village and the children also do not have
to forego their opportunities of a better life by foregoing education. There
is also the instance of Mr. Sadashiv Dadmal, who is one of the better-off
farmers of the village owning 40 acres of land. He says, “Though we have a large
land holding, prior to watershed development more than half my land remained
uncultivated for two seasons in a year as there was no water. Now as the water
level has improved, I have dug 2 more wells and purchased 4 motor pumps. I now
have 3 wells that provide ample water for my fields.” Sadashiv grows cotton,
sorghum, soyabean and all types of vegetables and pulses. He has 4 pairs of
bullocks and 5 cross bred cows. He also feels that prosperity has seeped into
the lives of all the villagers. “Now there are employment opportunities
available in the village all year round and people are earning money. What is
most important however is that people have learnt to save their hard earned
money through SHGs. This has made all the difference”. This opinion highlights
how women play an illuminating role in transforming lives, and are thus
instrumental in transcendence from a plateau to planes of higher elevations.
|
|
The Acquisition of Wisdom and the Dawn
of Empowerment |
|
A successful initiative often has many failures intertwined in the fabric of
experience. These failures however keep transforming themselves into lessons,
upon which the transcendental success is based. It is therefore important to
draw upon such experiences so as to help chart out similar activities. It is
relatively difficult to work in a tribal village as compared to a non-tribal
village as they are cocooned in a world of their own. This in their perception
is a haven, bound as they are by the fetters of ignorance. The implementing
agency has to display wilful perseverance, sincerity, grit and utmost patience
when dealing with such villages, which finally shows up as beautiful
embossments.
Demonstration projects have a huge and resounding impact. In Mandwa, the
villagers were convinced about the potential and the impact of watershed
projects only after they saw the watershed at Mendwan village in Ahmednagar
district with their own eyes. It emboldened them to take on the challenge with
the requisite thrust. It is therefore extremely important that model villages be
created, and more importantly be demonstrated to reluctant and passive villages
to convince them about the existence of a threshold to a new way of life.
Initially there was great reluctance on the part of the villagers for
shramdaan. The agency had to adopt different means to win over the trust of the
people and without any undue altercation. Very simple strategies were adopted.
When asked to prioritize their needs, the villagers complained of many of them
suffering from toothache. In response, a dentist was called for and the patients
were given proper diagnosis and medication. Blankets, seeds and fertilizers were
also distributed to the villagers to win their trust and to convey to them that
it was their welfare that was the priority.
Nonetheless, no organization however dedicated, can implement its plans
without cooperation from the formal authorities. In Mandwa, the implementing
agency worked its way through rapport building with the forest department to
carry out its activities unhindered. Though this took quite a while, today the
dividends are there for all to see.
The novel as well as noble concept of Shramdaan is value-loaded, not just
merely because it provides the villagers with employment, but more crucially
because it creates a sense of belongingness amongst the community towards the
entire set of activities aimed at a ‘positively inclusive’ change.
Highly motivated social workers with excellent communication skills and an
internalized understanding of the ways of rural life are required for successful
implementation of such projects. Skilled technical persons are equally
indispensable. The underlying strength however is dedication.
One very important lesson that cannot be overlooked is that once the
community is brought together and capacitated for a cause, it is highly likely
that it will trigger off many other positive outcomes. Therefore, it is
important that external development interventions address the most deeply and
widely felt needs of the community so as to ensure maximum participation.
Mandwa today is a confident village ready to take on any challenge with an
undaunted spirit. What is most heartening about the village is the fact that
success has not made the village complacent. The village is now focussing on
construction of roads, which can rightly be envisaged as the next orbit that
will mould their lives further. Mandwa is now in search of newer means for
better ends. Watershed development with its accompanying feature of women
empowerment in the form of SHGs thus spelt the prelude to a ‘watershed’ moment
in their mundane and seemingly meaningless lives.
Mandwa’s rags-to-riches story is not just “yet another oft-heard” tale of
success. The spotlight is on the indomitable spirit of WOTR and CRTDP and the
relentless strife of the villagers in achieving a landmark success. It is a
practical fairy tale of the modern times, where wringing hands in despair is not
the preferred agenda. Rather it is sheer grit and perseverance that pays off.
The bright side of this tale is that it can be learnt from, replicated and
relived. |
|
|
|
|
|
|